Comments on: Bioperformance Founder Responds

By: Joseph Bascue

Joseph Bascue — Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:04:24 +0000

Bioperformance does not work … it has hurt our 98 Chrysler Town and Country and personally I think they should be litigated. We submitted our resignation in March … kinda got tired of my fingers smelling like mothballs too.
I sent a letter out to everyone including friends and family … Gil Browne my upline etc.
Take care of your engine … change your oil … watch your tires and use quality gas. This equalls better gas milage.
Doesnt BP realize that good milage is relative to the weather wind etc etc?
Fraud … and take it from a distributor like myself who not only tried it in a van but a wrangler jeep as well
JUNK!!!!

By: Michael Herns

Michael Herns — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:42:21 +0000

http://www.dallasobserver.com/Issues/2006-05-25/news/feature_full.html

By: Michael Herns

Michael Herns — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:41:24 +0000

I found this article to be the most insightful article yet about the whole MLM industry and BioPerformance in particular. I am a BP Area Manager and will be promptly submiting my letter of resignation next week, regardless of the litigation outcome – this company has been effectively killed.

By: Luke

Luke — Sun, 21 May 2006 07:19:53 +0000

Bonnie Murphy: I can understand that you feel upset. Browse a bit through this site and you will find some good reasons why Biop. is at least questionable. And... no it's not the same as other MLM legal problems; they are all different. For those who have said that there is no naphthalene in the Biop. Pills check out this site: http://www.bioperformancepro.com Do some research! ISO 9000 is not a test but establishes a standard. ISO 9000 does not prove anything about the fact that the pills are working or not! ISO stands for International Organization for Standardization. Do some Google and you will understand better, that the term and/or concept has been misused by Biop. Have you SERIOUSLY read the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) presented by Biop.? It is drawn up by the company itself, and there is NO NAME identifying the person who made it. Also it states CLEARLY: Solid crystal Odor and Appearance: Aromatic Camphor Aromatic Camphor is a rather vague description. Solid crystal is very clear. Certainly these do not refer to trace elements! It seems crushingly clear that the 51% owner Lowell Sims is quite evasive about the naphthalene issue; that too speaks volumes. In the MSDS of another company with a similar product I find various synonyms used for the same inbgredient! Synonyms: albocarbon, mighty 150, mighty rd1, moth flakes, NCI-C52904, white tar, naphthalin, naphthene, camphor tar, tar camphor, moth balls. I rest my case. To me, there are too many unanswered questions and too much vagueness with Bp. A company of that size that does not accept credit card payments does not suggest much credibility. The documentation they present appears rather manipulative. Email me if you need more info. And then just recently, the very last shipments Biop. members have received was reportedly accompanied with small note for each bottle with: "Short term exposure, inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact with BioPerformance product can cause hemolytic anemia, damage to liver, and neurological damage." But all the while, the bottles still state "non toxic". Go figure this out! I hope you wrote in good faith, but please study the matter a bit more. I wish you well! Luke

By: Bonnie Murphy

Bonnie Murphy — Thu, 18 May 2006 23:33:37 +0000

I am very upset about the false accusations that are being made towards BioPerformance. I have used the product since early March and have had nothing but great results with using BioPerformance. I have increased my mileage between 4 to 8 more miles per gallon depending on highway v.s. city driving and my pickup has never ran better. BioPerformance has proof by the ISO 9000 tests that have been done and have the Material Safety Data Sheets that state BioPerformance is safe. These allegations state the product does not work, it is an illeagal pyramid scheme,(which this marketing plan is no different from MaryKay, Pure Romance, Amway, and etc.) I wonder who may be behind these allegations? Possibly big oil companies? I hope there will be a HUGE PUBLIC APOLOGY and RETRACTION made by this wonderful Attorney General of Texas.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 18 May 2006 22:30:26 +0000

James,

Two independent labs in two separate states receently tested the product and got the same results.

And BTW, do some reserach on Mr. Mims. This isn’t the first MLM scam he’s been involded in either!

By: James Stewart--CA

James Stewart--CA — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:45:25 +0000

Re: Bioperformance ‘fraud’?
I appreciate the chance to set the record straight. Mind you, I only know from personal experience, which the Texas attorney general appears to have NONE with this product.
I am baffled by the results of the U of Central Florida’s “test.” This pill works on my car and a high percentage of those I KNOW who have tried it.
Do you mean to tell me that 50,000 plus distributors spent $500 on this product and are telling everyone about its wonderful results in spite of it being a total fraud?
If my car didn’t run to well and with such gas savings, there is no way I (or in my opinion, hardly anyone) would share this good news with others, on such a grand scale!(over 50,000 in 5 months.) Guess we’re all crooks and liars, who incidentally are getting around going more miles on less money, and saving the air at the same time. This product works, and every testimonial is notarized, unlike the “study.” Was it funded by Exxon?
Recent actions suggest even greater government complicity in our fuel ‘crisis.’ Bioperformance WORKS. That’s the bottom line.